Puzzle Healthcare
MUSC Health · Post-Acute Intelligence
MUSC Health · Medical University of South Carolina
Post-Acute Network
Analytics Dashboard
CMS Medicare FFS Claims · 2024 Q1 – 2025 Q4 (FFS); 2023 (CMS Payer Mix) · Prepared by Puzzle Healthcare
42.9%
System FSHR
(Facility Hosp Rate)
CMS Medicare FFS Claims
1,496
FFS SNF
Patients
2024 Q1 – 2025 Q4 (FFS); 2023 (CMS Payer Mix)
142
Unique SNF
Destinations
System-wide
15
Priority
Targets
Engagement targets
Priority Intervention Targets · System-Wide
Top 15 SNF Partners by Hospitalization Leverage 530 SNF patients (named) across priority targets
1THE OAKS HEALTHCARE LLC40 pts · 62.4% FSHR · 3H 2NHC HEALTHCARE, CHARLESTON58 pts · 54.5% FSHR 3PRUITTHEALTH - BLYTHEWOOD30 pts · 63.0% FSHR · 6H 4WHITE OAK MANOR CHARLESTON20 pts · 70.3% FSHR 5RAILROAD CROSSING HEALTHCARE, INC.17 pts · 69.2% FSHR 6SOUTHLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER21 pts · 62.3% FSHR · 3H 7SENIOR CARE OF MARION LLC15 pts · 63.4% FSHR · 3H 8JOHNS ISLAND POST ACUTE39 pts · 50.6% FSHR · 3H 9RIVERSIDE HEALTH AND REHAB24 pts · 54.7% FSHR · 2H 10THE PALMS AT FLORENCE79 pts · 46.2% FSHR · 4H 11JOLLEY ACRES HEALTHCARE CENTER42 pts · 49.1% FSHR · 3H 12ASHLEY RIVER HEALTHCARE24 pts · 52.6% FSHR · 2H 13LANCASTER CONVALESCENT CENTER57 pts · 46.1% FSHR · 5H 14RICE NURSING HOME32 pts · 48.5% FSHR · 4H 15COOPER RIVER POST ACUTE32 pts · 48.1% FSHR · 3H
Priority score combines FSHR magnitude, patient volume, and multi-hospital presence. FSHR = Facility Hospitalization Rate from CMS Medicare FFS Claims. System FSHR benchmark: 42.9%. Data period: 2024 Q1 – 2025 Q4 (FFS); 2023 (CMS Payer Mix).
Key Findings
1
Meaningful FSHR Variation Across MUSC Health: 25.0% to 50.6%
The system-wide weighted average FSHR is 42.9%, but individual hospital performance ranges from 25.0% (Chester) to 50.6% (Orangeburg). This 25.6 percentage point spread represents significant, actionable variation in post-acute network performance across MUSC Health that is not yet fully visible within the current care management infrastructure.
2
15 SNF Partners Account for Concentrated Hospitalization Risk
15 priority target SNFs serve 530 patients system-wide with above-average FSHR rates. The top target, The Oaks Healthcare Llc, carries a 62.4% FSHR — 19.5 percentage points above the system average. These facilities represent the highest-leverage engagement opportunities for MUSC Health's post-acute network management program.
3
78 Cross-System SNFs Create System-Level Engagement Opportunities
78 SNFs receive patients from 2 or more MUSC Health hospitals, creating system-level leverage for preferred network conversations. The highest-volume cross-system SNF, Karesh Long Term Care, serves 119 patients across 6 hospitals. Coordinated engagement at these facilities allows MUSC Health to move network-wide performance with a single partnership conversation.
4
Limited Visibility Across 11 Hospitals: 142 Destinations, Partial FSHR Ratings
MUSC Health's 11 active hospitals collectively discharge to 142 distinct SNF destinations. Many SNF relationships lack facility-level FSHR data due to CMS suppression thresholds for small-volume relationships. This limited visibility constrains MUSC Health's ability to systematically identify underperforming partners and build a high-performing preferred post-acute network. Structured SNF engagement and preferred network designation would create the monitoring infrastructure needed to close this gap.
5
7 Hospitals Below CMS Reporting Thresholds — Data Gap to Address
Seven MUSC Health hospitals fall below CMS Medicare FFS claims volume thresholds for this reporting period and have no FSHR-rated SNF relationships in the data. These include specialty and satellite facilities grouped under shared CCNs (CCN 420004 covers 4 hospitals including children's and psychiatric campuses; CCN 420026 covers 2 affiliated hospitals; CCN 423033 covers 2 rehabilitation/IRF facilities). This is a legitimate low-FFS-volume claim pattern for pediatric, psychiatric, and IRF services — not a data gap. As MUSC Health's post-acute network management program matures, ensuring these sites are included in preferred network initiatives and tracked through internal data will be critical to comprehensive system performance management.
Hospital Portfolio · 11 Active Entities
Orangeburg
Orangeburg, SC
50.6%
124SNF Pts (named)
25SNF Dests
13.1% utilSNF Util
Florence
Florence, SC
47.9%
236SNF Pts (named)
47SNF Dests
13.6% utilSNF Util
Columbia Downtown
Columbia, SC
46.1%
114SNF Pts (named)
43SNF Dests
9.1% utilSNF Util
UMC Charleston
Charleston, SC
43.7%
465SNF Pts (named)
79SNF Dests
8.0% utilSNF Util
Lancaster
Lancaster, SC
40.1%
109SNF Pts (named)
15SNF Dests
11.4% utilSNF Util
Kershaw
Camden, SC
38.0%
112SNF Pts (named)
17SNF Dests
20.6% utilSNF Util
Waccamaw
Murrells Inlet, SC
36.8%
208SNF Pts (named)
20SNF Dests
9.7% utilSNF Util
Georgetown
Georgetown, SC
33.3%
48SNF Pts (named)
7SNF Dests
10.1% utilSNF Util
Marion
Mullins, SC
31.4%
15SNF Pts (named)
11SNF Dests
18.8% utilSNF Util
Chester
Chester, SC
25.0%
16SNF Pts (named)
10SNF Dests
15.6% utilSNF Util
Columbia Northeast
Columbia, SC
49SNF Pts (named)
24SNF Dests
util n/aSNF Util
Patient Risk Distribution
Very High
0.0%
High
30.7%
Medium
69.3%
Low
0.0%
Very Low
0.0%
Facility Risk Distribution
Very High
23.1%
High
36.1%
Medium
5.3%
Low
0.0%
Very Low
0.0%